Use of 55 PET radiotracers under approval of a Radioactive Drug Research Committee (RDRC)

In the US, EU and elsewhere, basic clinical research studies with positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers that are generally recognized as safe and effective (GRASE) can often be conducted under institutional approval. For example, in the United States, such research is conducted under the oversight of a Radioactive Drug Research Committee (RDRC) as long as certain requirements are met. Firstly, the research must be for basic science and cannot be intended for immediate therapeutic or diagnostic purposes, or to determine the safety and effectiveness of the PET radiotracer. Secondly, the PET radiotracer must be generally recognized as safe and effective. Specifically, the mass dose to be administered must not cause any clinically detectable pharmacological effect in humans, and the radiation dose to be administered must be the smallest dose practical to perform the study and not exceed regulatory dose limits within a 1-year period. In our experience, the main barrier to using a PET radiotracer under RDRC approval is accessing the required information about mass and radioactive dosing.

Results

The University of Michigan (UM) has a long history of using PET radiotracers in clinical research studies. Herein we provide dosing information for 55 radiotracers that will enable other PET Centers to use them under the approval of their own RDRC committees.

Conclusions

The data provided herein will streamline future RDRC approval, and facilitate further basic science investigation of 55 PET radiotracers that target functionally relevant biomarkers in high impact disease states.

Background

Human use of positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers in a given country (or member states in the case of the European Union) is required to be conducted under appropriate governmental oversight (Schwarz and Decristoforo 2019; Schwarz et al. 2019). In this paper, we focus upon clinical use of PET radiotracers in the United States, which is regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (VanBrocklin 2008; Harapanhalli 2010; Schwarz et al. 2014). However, we expect the regulatory concepts described herein to also hold true in other locations, particularly in light of recent efforts to harmonize PET regulations around the world (Schwarz et al. 2019).

In the US, clinical use of PET radiotracers is conducted under the umbrella of an FDA-approved New Drug Application (NDA) or, in the case of generic PET radiotracers, an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA). Human research is also conducted under governance of the FDA, via three major pathways: i) the Investigational New Drug application (IND), ii) an exploratory IND (eIND), or iii) under the oversight of a Radioactive Drug Research Committee (RDRC) (Suleiman et al. 2006; FDA Guidance for Industry and Researchers: The Radioactive Drug Research Committee: Human Research without an Investigational New Drug Application 2010; Carpenter Jr et al. 2009; Mosessian et al. 2014). The necessary path to approval is dictated by parameters outlined below, as well as the stated purpose of the research in question (Fig. 1).

While the IND and eIND represent the most common pathways to FDA approval for first-in-man studies, some of the requirements (e.g., costly toxicology in two species for an IND) represent significant hurdles to overcome in the application process. One notable solution, as described by Mosessian et al., is to divide labor and preparation for different components of the application between different cores and facilities at a given institution (Mosessian et al. 2014). In contrast, conducting human PET research under RDRC oversight represents a relatively efficient and cost effective path to FDA approval. The concept of the RDRC was introduced in 1975, and committees are charged by the FDA with the responsibility of overseeing PET research at the institutional level. RDRC committees are comprised of at least 5 members and are required to include people with the following expertise:

• Physicians specializing in nuclear medicine;
• Nuclear pharmacists and/or radiochemists that are trained and qualified to formulate radioactive drugs;
• Persons having training in radiation safety and radiation dosimetry;
• Individuals specializing in disciplines pertinent to nuclear medicine (radiology, internal medicine, hematology, endocrinology, radiation therapy, clinical pharmacology, etc.).

In order for a given PET imaging study to be conducted under RDRC approval, the proposed research must meet the following criteria (as described comprehensively in 21 CFR 361.1):

• Stated purpose of the research must fall under the category of basic science, including but not limited to studies of: metabolism, kinetics, biodistribution, pathophysiology, biochemistry, transporter processes, and receptor binding/occupancy.
• The research cannot be intended for immediate therapeutic or diagnostic purposes, or to determine the safety and effectiveness of the PET radiotracer, but can have therapeutic/diagnostic implications. If at any point research initiated under RDRC approval shifts to directly address these subjects, IND approval must be obtained prior to further studies.
• The protocol must involve less than 30 patients, of age 18 or older (exceptions possible pending special approval), and women of child bearing potential must provide a written statement that they are not pregnant (without exception).
• The PET radiotracer is generally recognized as safe and effective (GRASE). Specifically:
  • ◦ The mass dose to be administered must not cause any clinically detectable pharmacological effect in humans. It is important to note that this generally precludes first-in-human testing of a PET radiotracer from being done under RDRC approval. Notably, RDRC approval can be used for study of radiolabeled endogenous molecules, as well as isotopic substitutions on clinically characterized compounds (i.e; substituting 18 F for 19 F on a small molecule ligand that has previously been approved and studied by the FDA, often via IND)
  • ◦ The radiation dose to be administered must be the smallest dose practical to perform a given study. Specifically, the radiation dose to an adult research subject from a single study, or cumulatively from a number of studies, conducted within 1 year may not exceed established regulatory dose limits:
    1. (a) Whole Body / Active Blood-Forming Organs / Lens of Eye / Gonads: Single Dose (Effective Dose) = 3 rem (0.03 Sv), Annual & Total Effective Dose Commitment = 5 rem (0.05 Sv);
    2. (b) Other Organs: Single Dose = 5 rem (0.05 Sv); Annual and Total Dose Commitment = 15 rem (0.15 Sv).

  The radiation dose to a subject consists of the sum total of all sources of radiation associated with the research protocol, including the PET radiotracer(s), associated x-ray procedures (including CT scans, PET transmission scans etc.) and any follow-up studies.

  If all of these criteria are met, then the research can proceed following RDRC and IRB approval. Research conducted in RDRC studies is considered basic science. Specifically, basic science research is intended to advance scientific knowledge, but not to evaluate safety or efficacy of a PET radiotracer or to make clinical decisions. Failure to meet this, or any of the other RDRC criteria outlined above, necessitates that the research be conducted under an IND or eIND application that has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), as outlined in 21 CFR 312 (Mosessian et al. 2014).

  To ensure compliance with the pertinent regulations, FDA vests RDRC committees with oversight responsibility for basic science research conducted at the committee’s institution. The committee reviews and approves research protocols to ensure compliance with RDRC regulations, and submits annual reports to FDA that list committee members and summarize all studies conducted under the committee’s approval in the preceding year. The RDRC committee must also submit a special summary (Form FDA 2915) for any approved study involving > 30 research subjects (Suleiman et al. 2006).

  Conducting human PET imaging under RDRC approval represents a straightforward and economical pathway to clinical use, particularly since there is no requirement for resource intensive pharmacology-toxicology studies. In our experience, the main barrier to using a PET radiotracer for basic science under RDRC approval is actually accessing the required information about pharmacological dose/mass and radioactive dose. For a given radiotracer this information can either come from the peer-reviewed scientific literature or other valid data, often in the form of a signed letter from an institution already working with the radiotracer in question. In an effort to remove barriers to those wishing to conduct clinical PET research under RDRC, herein we provide pharmacological dose and radioactive dosimetry details for 55 such PET radiotracers that will enable other PET Centers to use them under the approval of their own RDRC committees, eliminating the need to obtain a specific signed letter on a case-by-case basis. The article is made available Open Access in an attempt to further improve accessibility for our imaging colleagues, and we encourage other PET Centers with large clinical radiotracer portfolios to publish sister articles in the near future.

  Methods

  Radiosyntheses

  PET radiotracers were commercially available, or synthesized according to the literature radiosyntheses referenced in Table 1 or novel radiosyntheses described in the Supporting Information. Production and quality control of all radiotracers was conducted according to current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) using the guidelines outlined in the US Pharmacopeia, (USP < 823>Positron Emission Tomography Drugs for Compounding, Investigational, and Research Uses 2020).

  Table 1 Radiotracers used clinically at the University of Michigan

  Dosimetry

  Radiation-absorbed-dose estimates can either be obtained from literature sources or determined using the OLINDA/EXM 1.0 software package (Stabin et al. 2005). Table 1 provides literature sources of dosimetry wherever available. For any radiotracers where literature dosimetry is unavailable, dosimetry is provided in the Supporting Information.

  Imaging

  Research PET scans have been conducted since the first PET scanner was installed at the University of Michigan (UM) in the 1980s. Historical examples of imaging studies mostly conducted at our Center with the various radiotracers are provided in Table 1, including practical information on both scanning protocols and image kinetic analysis. Injected dose (MBq), mass dose limits (μg) and historical numbers of subjects scanned are provided in Table 2.

  Table 2 Dosing information

  Discussion

  At the University of Michigan we have a long history of using PET radiotracers in clinical research studies (using both the RDRC and IND mechanisms). Detailed information for 55 such radiotracers is provided in Table 1, including references for radiosyntheses and dosimetry available in the peer-reviewed literature. Synthesis ([ 11 C]butanol, [ 18 F]ASEM, [ 18 F]FDOPA, [ 68 Ga]PSMA-11) and dosimetry ([ 18 F]ASEM, [ 11 C]butanol, [ 11 C]HED, [ 11 C]LY2795050, [ 11 C]MPH, [ 18 F]MPPF, [ 11 C]PMP, [ 11 C]RO-54864) information that has not previously been published is provided in the Supporting Information associated with this article. Pharmacological dose and radioactivity dosing information for the PET drugs is also provided (Table 2), along with historical numbers of administrations to subjects at the University of Michigan PET Center. Rationale for those radiotracers without mass dose limits is provided in the Supporting Information.

  As noted above, a study conducted under RDRC oversight cannot exceed 30 subjects without special provisions. The PET drugs corresponding to some of the larger numbers of subjects discussed herein have been used in numerous different RDRC studies over the course of many years (and decades in some instances). In the event any given study exceeded 30 research subjects, the RDRC committee filed a special summary (Form FDA 2915). At the doses specified, no pharmacological or physiological changes were observed after intravenous administration of any of the PET drugs, and the basic science studies were conducted without exceeding any regulatory radiation dose limits. All scans have been reported to the US FDA in the annual RDRC reports required by the agency.

  Conclusion

  While an IND (or eIND) is the dominant route to FDA approval for first-in-man studies, collection of the requisite data and preparation of the application can be a daunting and resource intensive task. Proceeding under approval of a Radioactive Drug Research Committee therefore represents an attractive mechanism for clinical studies of compounds that have (a) already been studied in man and (b) are well characterized in terms of pharmacology and dosimetry. Initiation of a new study for such an established compound is contingent upon access to mass dose and dosimetry data. The data provided herein will streamline future RDRC approval, and facilitate further basic science investigation of 55 PET drugs that target functionally relevant biomarkers in high impact disease states.

  Availability of data and materials

  The datasets used in the current paper are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

  Abbreviations

  Abbreviated new drug application

  Current good manufacturing practice

  Food and Drug Administration

  Investigational new drug

  New drug application

  Positron emission tomography

  Radioactive drug research committee

  United States Pharmacopeia

  References

  • Afshar-Oromieh A, Hetzheim H, Kübler W, Kratochwil C, Giesel FL, Hope TA, Eder M, Eisenhut M, Kopka K, Haberkorn U. Radiation dosimetry of 68 Ga-PSMA-11 (HBED-CC) and preliminary evaluation of optimal imaging timing. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:1611–20. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Albin R, Koeppe R, Bohnen N, Wernette K, Kilbourn M, Frey K. Spared caudal brainstem SERT binding in early Parkinson disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008;28:441–4. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Albin RL, Koeppe RA, Wernette K, Zhuang W, Nichols T, Kilbourn MR, Frey KA. Striatal [ 11 C]dihydrotetrabenazine and [ 11 C]methylphenidate binding in Tourette syndrome. Neurology. 2009;72:1390–6. CASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • Alves VH, Abrunhosa AJ, Castelo-Branco M. Optimisation of synthesis, purification and reformulation of (R)-[N-Methyl-11C]PK11195 for in vivo PET imaging studies. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 3rd Portuguese Meeting in Bioengineering (ENBENG), Braga, Portugal, 20–23 February 2013; pp. 1–5.
  • Aznavour N, Zimmer L. [ 18 F]MPPF as a tool for the in vivo imaging of 5-HT1A receptors in animal and human brain. Neuropharmacology. 2007;52:695–707. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Beanlands RS, Muzik O, Hutchins GD, Wolfe ER Jr, Schwaiger M. Heterogeneity of regional nitrogen 13-labeled ammonia tracer distribution in the normal human heart: comparison with rubidium 82 and copper 62-labeled PTSM. J Nucl Cardiol. 1994;1:225–35. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Beck R, Roper B, Carlsen JM, Huisman MC, Lebschi JA, Andratschke N, Picchio M, Souvatzoglou M, Machulla H-J, Piert M. Pretreatment 18F-FAZA PET Predicts Success of Hypoxia-Directed Radiochemotherapy Using Tirapazamine. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:973–980. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Bertagna F, Biasiotto G, Giubbini R. The role of F-18-fluorothymidine PET in oncology. Clin Transl Imaging. 2013;1:77–97. Google Scholar
  • Blecha JE, Henderson BD, Hockley BG, VanBrocklin HF, Zubieta J-K, DaSilva AF, Kilbourn MR, Koeppe RA, Scott PJH, Shao X. An updated synthesis of [ 11 C]Carfentanil for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of the μ-opioid receptor J. Labelled Comp Radiopharm. 2017;60:375–80. CASGoogle Scholar
  • Brihaye C, Depresseux JC, Comar D. Radiation dosimetry for bolus administration of oxygen-15-water. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:651–6. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Brown AK, Fujita M, Fujimura Y, Liow J-S, Stabin M, Ryu YH, Imaizumi M, Hong J, Pike VW, Innis RB. Radiation dosimetry and biodistribution in monkey and man of 11 C-PBR28: a PET radioligand to image inflammation. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:2072–9. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Bruehlmeier M, Roelcke U, Schubiger PA, Ametamey SM. Assessment of hypoxia and perfusion in human brain tumors using PET with 18 F-fluoromisonidazole and 15 O-H₂O. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1851–9. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Burke JF, Albin RL, Koeppe RA, Giordani B, Kilbourn MR, Gilman S, Frey KA. Assessment of mild dementia with amyloid and dopamine terminal positron emission tomography. Brain. 2011;134(Pt 6):1647–57. PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • Carpenter AP Jr, Pontecorvo MJ, Hefti FF, Skovronsky DM. The use of the exploratory IND in the evaluation and development of 18 F-PET radiopharmaceuticals for amyloid imaging in the brain: a review of one company's experience. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;53:387–93. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Chakraborty PK, Gildersleeve DL, Jewett DM, Toorongian SA, Kilbourn MR, Schwaiger M, Wieland DM. High yield synthesis of high specific activity R-( −)-[ 11 C]epinephrine for routine PET studies in humans. Nucl Med Biol. 1993;20:939–44. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Chevalme Y-M, Montravers F, Vuillez J-P, Zanca M, Fallais C, Oustrin J, Talbot J-N. FDOPA-(18F): a PET radiopharmaceutical recently registered for diagnostic use in countries of the European Union. Braz Arch Biol Technol. 2007;50:77–90. Google Scholar
  • Choi JY, Lyoo CH, Lee JH, Cho H, Kim KM, Kim JS, Ryu YH. Human radiation dosimetry of [ 18 F]AV-1451(T807) to detect tau pathology. Mol Imaging Biol. 2016;18:479–82. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Christensen NL, Jakobsen S, Schacht AC, Munk OL, Alstrup AKO, Tolbod LP, Harms HJ, Nielsen S, Gormsen LC. Whole-body biodistribution, dosimetry, and metabolite correction of [ 11 C]Palmitate: a PET tracer for imaging of fatty acid metabolism. Mol Imaging. 2017;16:1–9. CASGoogle Scholar
  • DaSilva JN, Carey JE, Sherman PS, Pisani TJ, Kilbourn MR. Characterization of [ 11 C]tetrabenazine as an in vivo radioligand for the vesicular monoamine transporter. Nucl Med Biol. 1994;21:151–6. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • DaSilva JN, Kilbourn MR, Mangner TJ. Synthesis of a [ 11 C]methoxy derivative of α-dihydrotetrabenazine: a radioligand for studying the vesicular monoamine transporter. Appl Radiat Isot. 1993a;44:1487–9. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • DaSilva JN, Kilbourn MR, Mangner TJ. Synthesis of a [ 11 C]tetrabenazine, a vesicular monoamine uptake inhibitor, for PET imaging studies. Appl Radiat Isot. 1993b;44:673–6. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Davenport MS, Montgomery JS, Kunju LP, Siddiqui J, Shankar PR, Rajendiran T, Shao X, Lee E, Denton B, Barnett C, Piert M. 18 F-choline PET/mpMRI for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: part 1. Improved risk stratification for MRI-guided transrectal prostate biopsies. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:337–43. CASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • de Jong HW, Rijzewijk LJ, Lubberink M, van der Meer RW, Lamb HJ, Smit JW, Diamant M, Lammertsma AA. Kinetic models for analysing myocardial [ 11 C]palmitate data. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:966–78. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • DeGrado TR, Reiman RE, Price DT, Wang S, Coleman RE. Pharmacokinetics and radiation dosimetry of 18 F-fluorocholine. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:92–6. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Del Rosario RB, Jung Y-W, Caraher J, Chakraborty PK, Wieland DM. Synthesis and preliminary evaluation of [ 11 C]-(−)-phenylephrine as a functional heart neuronal PET agent. Nucl Med Biol. 1996;23:611–6. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Deloar HM, Fujiwara T, Nakamura T, Itoh M, Imai D, Miyaka M, Watanuki S. Estimation of internal absorbed dose of L-[methyl- 11 C]methionine using whole-body positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 1998;25:629–33. CASGoogle Scholar
  • Dick DW, Watkins GL. Synthesis of oxygen-15 water ([ 15 O]H₂O). In: Scott PJH, editor. Radiochemical syntheses volume 2: further radiopharmaceuticals for positron emission tomography and new strategies for their production. Hoboken: Wiley; 2015. p. 105–13. Google Scholar
  • Dollé F, Bottlaender M, Demphel S, Emond P, Fuseau C, Coulon C, Ottaviani M, Valette H, Loch C, Halldin C, Mauclare L, Guilloteau D, Maziere B, Crouzel C. Highly efficient synthesis of [ 11 C]PE2I, a selective radioligand for the quantification of the dopamine transporter using PET. J Labelled Comp Radiopharm. 2000;43:997–1004. Google Scholar
  • Drake LR, Pham JM, Desmond TJ, Mossine AV, Lee SJ, Kilbourn MR, Koeppe RA, Brooks AF, Scott PJH. Identification of AV-1451 as a weak, nonselective inhibitor of monoamine oxidase. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2019;10:3839–46. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Duvernoy CS, Raffel DM, Swanson SD, Jaiswal M, Mueller G, Ibrahim E-S, Pennathur S, Plunkett C, Stojanovska J, Brown MB, Pop-Busui R. Left ventricular metabolism, function, and sympathetic innervation in men and women with type 1 diabetes. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016;23:960–9. PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • Fabbri C, Galassi R, Moretti A, Sintuzzi E, Mautone V, Sarti G, Strigari L, Benassi M, Matteucci F. Radiation dosimetry of 18 F-flurocholine PET/CT studies in prostate cancer patients. Phys Med. 2014;30:346–51. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Fallahi B, Manafi-Farid R, Eftekhari M, Fard-Esfahani A. Diagnostic efficiency of 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT as compared to 99m Tc-Octreotide SPECT/CT and conventional morphologic modalities in neuroendocrine tumors. Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol. 2019;7:129–40. PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • FDA Guidance for Industry and Researchers: The Radioactive Drug Research Committee: Human Research without an Investigational New Drug Application. 2010. https://www.fda.gov/media/76286/download. Accessed 7 Jul 2020.
  • Frey KA, Koeppe RA. PET amyloid analyses. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1168–9. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Frey KA, Koeppe RA, Mulholland GK, Jewett D, Hichwa R, Ehrenkaufer RLE, Carey JE, Wieland DM, Kuhl DE, Agranoff BW. In vivo muscarinic Cholingeric receptor imaging in human brain with [ 11 C]scopolamine and positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1992;12:147–54. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Gao Y, Kellar KJ, Yasuda RP, Tran T, Xiao Y, Dannals RF, Horti AG. Derivatives of dibenzothiophene for PET imaging of a7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. J Med Chem. 2013;56:7574–89. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Graham MM, Peterson LM, Link JM, Evans ML, Rasey JS, Koh W-J, Caldwell JH, Krohn KA. Fluorine-18-Fluoromisonidazole radiation dosimetry in imaging studies. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:1631–6. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Haka MS, Kilbourn MR. Synthesis of [ 18 F]GBR 13119, a presynaptic dopamine uptake antagonist. Appl Radiat Isot. 1988;39:279–82. Google Scholar
  • Haka MS, Kilbourn MR. Synthesis of [ 18 F]GBR 12909, a dopamine reuptake inhibitor. J Labelled Comp Radiopharm. 1990;28:793–9. CASGoogle Scholar
  • Halldin C, Erixon-Lindroth N, Pauli S, Chou Y-H, Okubo Y, Karlsson P, Lundkvist C, Olsson H, Guilloteau D, Emond P, Farde L. [ 11 C]PE2I: a highly selective radioligand for PET examination of the dopamine transporter in monkey and human brain. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30:1220–30. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Harapanhalli RS. Food and Drug Administration requirements for testing and approval of new radiopharmaceuticals. Semin Nucl Med. 2010;40:364–84. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Hirvonen J, Roivainen A, Virta J, Helin S, Någren K, Rinne JO. Human biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of 11 C-(R)-PK11195, the prototypic PET ligand to image inflammation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:606–12. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Hockley BG, Stewart MN, Sherman P, Quesada C, Kilbourn MR, Albin RL, Scott PJH. (−)-[ 18 F]Flubatine: evaluation in rhesus monkeys and a report of the first fully automated radiosynthesis validatedfor clinical use. J Labelled Comp Radiopharm. 2013;56:595–9. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Joshi AD, Pontecorvo MJ, Adler L, Stabin MG, Skovronsky DM, Carpenter AP, Mintun MA. Radiation dosimetry of florbetapir F 18. EJNMMI Res. 2014;4:4. PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • Junck L, Olson JM, Ciliax BJ, Koeppe RA, Watkins GL, Jewett DM, McKeever PE, Wieland DM, Kilbourn MR, Starosta-Rubinstein S, Mancini WR, Kuhl DE, Greenberg HS, Young AB. PET imaging of human gliomas with ligands for the peripheral benzodiazepine binding site. Ann Neurol. 1989;26:752–8. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Kaushik A, Jaimini A, Tripathi M, D'Souza M, Sharma R, Mishra AK, Mondal A, Dwarakanath BS. Estimation of patient dose in 18 F-FDG and 18 F-FDOPA PET/CT examinations. J Can Res Ther. 2013;9:477–83. CASGoogle Scholar
  • Kilbourn MR, Carey JE, Koeppe RA, Haka MS, Hutchins GD, Sherman PS, Kuhl DE. Biodistribution, dosimetry, metabolism and monkey PET studies of [ 18 F]GBR 13119. Imaging the dopamine uptake system in vivo. Nucl Med Biol. 1989;16:569–76. CASGoogle Scholar
  • Kilbourn MR, DaSilva JN, Frey KA, Koeppe RA, Kuhl DE. In vivo imaging of vesicular monoamine transporters in human brain using [ 11 C]Tetrabenazine and positron emission tomography. J Neurochem. 1993;60:2315–8. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Kilbourn MR, Koeppe RA. Classics in neuroimaging: radioligands for the vesicular monoamine transporter 2. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2019;10:25–9. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Koeppe RA, Frey KA, Mulholland GK, Kilbourn MR, Buck A, Lee KS, Kuhl DE. [ 11 C]Tropanyl Benzilate-binding to muscarinic cholinergic receptors: methodology and kinetic modeling alternatives. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1994;14:85–99. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Koeppe RA, Frey KA, Vander Borght TM, Kilbourn MR, Jewett DM, Lee LC, Kuhl DE. Kinetic evaluation of α-[C-11]dihydrotetrabenazine (DTBZ): a PET ligand for assessing the vesicular monoamine transporter. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:118P. Google Scholar
  • Koeppe RA, Gilman S, Joshi A, Liu S, Little R, Junck L, Heumann M, Frey KA, Albin RL. 11 C-DTBZ and 18 F-FDG PET measures in differentiating dementias. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:936–44. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Koeppe RA, Holthoff VA, Frey KA, Kilbourn MR, Kuhl DE. Compartmental analysis of [ 11 C]flumazenil kinetics for the estimation of ligand transport rate and receptor distribution using positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1991;11:735–44. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Koeppe RA, Kilbourn MR, Frey KA, Penney JB, Haka MS, Kuhl DE. Imaging and kinetic modeling of [F-18]GBR 12909, a dopamine uptake inhibitor. J Nucl Med. 1990b;31(Suppl):720. Google Scholar
  • Koeppe RA, Mangner T, Betz AL, Shulkin BL, Allen R, Kollros P, Kuhl DE, Agranoff BW. Use of [ 11 C]Aminocyclohexanecarboxylate for the measurement of amino acid uptake and distribution volume in human brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1990a;10:727–39. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Koole M, Lewis DM, Buckley C, Nelissen N, Vandenbulcke M, Brooks DJ, Vandenberghe R, Van Laere K. Whole-body biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of 18F-GE067: a radioligand for in vivo brain amyloid imaging. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:818–22. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Kramer V, Brooks AF, Haeger A, Kuljs RO, Rafique W, Koeppe RA, Raffel DM, Frey KA, Amaral H, Scott PJH, Riss PJ. Evaluation of [ 18 F]N-methyl-lansoprazole as a tau PET imaging agent in first-in-human studies. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2020;11:427–35. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Kranz M, Sattler B, Tiepot S, Wilke S, Deuther-Conrad W, Donat CK, Fischer S, Patt M, Schildan A, Patt J, Smits R, Hoepping A, Steinbach J, Sabri O, Brust P. Radiation dosimetry of the α₄β₂ nicotinic receptor ligand (+)-[ 18 F]flubatine, comparing preclinical PET/MRI and PET/CT to first-in-human PET/CT results. EJNMMI Physics. 2016;3:25. PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • Krasikova RN, Andersson J, Truong P, Nag S, Shchukina EV, Halldin C. A fully automated one-pot synthesis of [carbonyl- 11 C]WAY-100635 for clinical PET applications. Appl Rad Isot. 2009;67:73–8. CASGoogle Scholar
  • Kreisl WC, Lyoo CH, Liow JS, Wei M, Snow J, Page E, Jenko KJ, Morse CL, Zoghbi SS, Pike VW, Turner RS, Innis RB. 11 C-PBR28 binding to translocator protein increases with progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2016;44:53–61. CASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • Kuhl DE, Koeppe RA, Minoshima S, Snyder SE, Ficaro EP, Foster NL, Frey KA, Kilbourn MR. In vivo mapping of cerebral acetylcholinesterase activity in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 1999;52:691–9. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Kuhl DE, Koeppe RA, Snyder SE, Minoshima S, Frey KA, Kilbourn MR. In vivo butyrylcholinesterase activity is not increased in Alzheimer’s disease synapses. Ann Neurol. 2006;59:13–20. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Laymon CM, Narendran R, Mason NS, Carney JP, Lopresti BJ, Mathis CA, Mountz JM, Sashin D, Frankle WG. Human biodistribution and dosimetry of the PET radioligand [ 11 C]flumazenil (FMZ). Mol Imaging Biol. 2012;14:115–22. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Lin K-J, Weng Y-H, Wey S-P, Hsiao I-T, Lu C-S, Skovronsky D, Chang H-P, Kung M-P, Yen T-C. Whole-body biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of 18 F-FP-(+)-DTBZ ( 18 F-AV-133): a novel vesicular monoamine transporter 2 imaging agent. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1480–5. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Lu J-Q, Ichise M, Liow J-S, Ghose S, Vines D, Innis RB. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of the serotonin transporter ligand 11 C-DASB determined from human whole-body PET. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1555–9. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • McParland BJ, Lax M, Axelsson J, Wall A, Johansson S, Sorensen J. The biodistribution and internal radiation dosimetry of [ 18 F]GE-148 in healthy adult volunteers. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37(Suppl 2):S287. Google Scholar
  • Mejia AA, Nakamura T, Itoh M, Hatazawa J, Ishiwata K, Ido T, Matsumoto M, Watabe H, Watanuki S, Seo S. Absorbed dose estimated in positron emission tomography studies based on the administration of 18 F-labeled radiopharmaceuticals. J Radiat Res. 1991;32:243–61. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Mendes BM, Ferreira AV, Nascimento LTC, Ferreira SMZMD, Silveira FMB, Silva JB. New radiation dosimetry estimates for [ 18 F]FLT based on voxelized phantoms. Rad Res. 2018;190:37–44. CASGoogle Scholar
  • Mickey BJ, Ducci F, Hadgkinson CA, Langenecker SA, Goldman D, Zubieta J-K. Monoamine oxidase A genotype predicts human serotonin 1A receptor availability in vivo. J Neurosci. 2008;28:11354–9. CASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • Miller S, Li P, Schipper M, Junck L, Piert M, Lawrence TS, Tsien C, Cao Y, Kim MM. Metabolic tumor volume response assessment using 11 C-methionine positron emission tomography identifies glioblastoma tumor subregions that predict progression better than baseline or anatomic magnetic resonance imaging alone. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2019;5:53–61. PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • Minn H, Kauhanen S, Seppänen M, Nuutila P. 18 F-FDOPA: a multiple-target molecule. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:1915–8. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Minoshima S, Koeppe RA, Fessler JA, Mintun MA, Berger KL, Taylor SF, Kuhl DE. Integrated and automated data analysis method for neuronal activation studies using O-15 water PET. In: Ue-Mura K, Lassen NA, Jones T, Kanno I, editors. Quantification of brain function: tracer kinetics and image analysis in brain PET, International congress series 1030. Tokyo: Excepta Medica; 1993. p. 409–18. Google Scholar
  • Moran M, Wilson A, Stableford W, Wong M, Houle S, Vasdev N. A one-step radiosynthesis of [ 11 C]methylphenidate. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(Suppl 2):1498. Google Scholar
  • Mosessian S, Duarte-Vogel SM, Stout DB, Roos KP, Lawson GW, Jordan MC, Ogden A, Matter C, Sadeghi S, Mills GQ, Schelbert HR, Radu CG, Czernin J, Couto M, Phelps ME. INDs for PET molecular imaging probes-approach by an academic institution. Mol Imaging Biol. 2014;16:441–8. PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • Mossine AV, Brooks AF, Henderson BD, Hockley BG, Frey KA, Scott PJH. An updated radiosynthesis of [ 18 F]AV1451 for Tau PET imaging. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem. 2017;2:7. PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • Mossine AV, Tanzey SS, Brooks AF, Makaravage KJ, Ichiishi N, Miller JM, Henderson BD, Skaddan M, Sanford MS, Scott PJH. One-pot synthesis of high molar activity 6-[ 18 F]Fluoro-L-DOPA by cu-mediated fluorination of a BPin precursor org. Biomol Chem. 2019;17:8701–5. CASGoogle Scholar
  • Mossine AV, Tanzey SS, Brooks AF, Makaravage KJ, Ichiishi N, Miller JM, Henderson BD, Skaddan MB, Sanford MS, Scott PJH. Synthesis of high molar activity 6-[ 18 F]Fluoro-L-DOPA suitable for human use by cu-mediated fluorination of a BPin precursor. Nat Prot. 2020;15:1742–59. CASGoogle Scholar
  • Mulholland GK, Jewtt DM, Toorongian SA. Routine synthesis of N-[ 11 C-methyl]scopolamine by phosphite mediated reductive methylation with [ 11 C]formaldehyde. Appl Radiat Isot. 1988;39:373–9. CASGoogle Scholar
  • Mulholland GK, Kilbourn MR, Sherman P, Carey JE, Frey KA, Koeppe RA, Kuhl DE. Synthesis, in vivo biodistribution and dosimetry of [ 11 C]N-Methylpiperidyl Benzilate ([ 11 C]NMPB), a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist. Nucl Med Biol. 1995;22:13–7. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Mulholland GK, Otto CA, Jewett DM, Kilbourn MR, Koeppe RA, Sherman PS, Petry NA, Carey JE, Atkinson ER, Archer S, Frey KA, Kuhl DE. Synthesis, rodent biodistribution, dosimetry, metabolism, and monkey images of carbon-11- labeled (+)-2α-Tropanyl Benzilate: a central muscarinic receptor imaging agent. J NucI Med. 1992;33:423–30. CASGoogle Scholar
  • Münch G, Nguyen NT, Nekolla S, Ziegler S, Muzik O, Chakraborty P, Wieland DM, Schwaiger M. Evaluation of sympathetic nerve terminals with [ 11 C]epinephrine and [ 11 C]hydroxyephedrine and positron emission tomography. Circulation. 2000;101:516–23. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Murthy R, Harris P, Simpson N, Van Heertum R, Leibel R, Mann JJ, Parsey R. Whole body [ 11 C]-dihydrotetrabenazine imaging of baboons: biodistribution and human radiation dosimetry estimates. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:790–7. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Naganawa M, Zheng M-Q, Henry S, Nabulsi N, Lin S-F, Ropchan J, Labaree D, Najafzadeh S, Kapinos M, Tauscher J, Neumeister A, Carson RE, Huang Y. Test-retest reproducibility of binding parameters in humans with 11 C-LY2795050, an antagonist PET radiotracer for the kappa opioid receptor. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:243–8. PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • NETSPOT Prescribing Information. 2016. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2016/208547s000lbl.pdf. Accessed 7 Jul 2020.
  • Newberg AB, Ray R, Scheuermann J, Wintering N, Saffer J, Schmitz A, Freifelder R, Karp J, Lerman C, Divgi C. Dosimetry of 11 C-carfentanil, a μ-opioid receptor imaging agent. Nucl Med Commun. 2009;30:314–8. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Nye JA, Schuster DM, Yu W, Camp VM, Goodman MM, Votaw JR. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of the synthetic nonmetabolized amino acid analogue anti- 18 F-FACBC in humans. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1017–20. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • O’Keefe GJ, Saunder TH, Ng S, Ackerman U, Tochon-Danguy HJ, Chan JG, Gong S, Dyrks T, Lindemann S, Holl G, Dinkelborg L, Villemagne V, Rowe CC. Radiation dosimetry of b-amyloid tracers 11 C-PiB and 18 F-BAY94-9172. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:309–15. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Parsey RV, Belanger MJ, Sullivan GM, Simpson NR, Stabin MG, Van Heertum R, Mann JJ. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of 11 C-WAY100,635 in humans. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:614–9. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Petrou M, Frey KA, Kilbourn MR, Scott PJH, Raffel DM, Bohnen NI, Müller MLTM, Albin RL, Koeppe RA. In vivo imaging of human cholinergic nerve terminals with (−)-5- 18 F-Fluoroethoxybenzovesamicol: biodistribution, dosimetry, and tracer kinetic analyses. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:396–404. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Piert M, Park H, Khan A, Siddiqui J, Hussain H, Chenevert T, Wood D, Johnson T, Shah RB, Meyer C. Detection of aggressive primary prostate cancer with 11 C-choline PET/CT using multimodality fusion techniques. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:1585–93. CASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • Piert M, Shao X, Raffel DM, Davenport M, Montgomery J, Kunju P, Hockley BG, Siddiqui J, Scott PJH, Chinnaiyan AM, Rajendiran T. Preclinical evaluation of 11C-sarcosine as a substrate of proton-coupled amino acid transporters and first human application in prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1216–23. CASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • Quarles RP, Mintun MA, Larson KB, Markham J, MacLeod AM, Raichle ME. Measurement of regional cerebral blood flow with positron emission tomography: a comparison of [ 15 O]water to [ 11 C]Butanol with distributed-parameter and compartmental models. J Cerebral Blood Flow Metab. 1993;13:733–47. CASGoogle Scholar
  • Raffel DM, Corbett JR, Del Rosario RB, Gildersleeve DL, Chiao P-C, Schwaiger M, Wieland DM. Clinical evaluation of carbon-11-phenylephrine: MAO-sensitive marker of cardiac sympathetic neurons. J Nucl Med. 1996;37:1923–31. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Raffel DM, Jung Y-W, Koeppe RA, Jang KS, Gu G, Scott PJH, Murthy VL, Rothley J, Frey KA. First-in-human studies of [ 18 F]Fluorohydroxyphenethylguanidines: PET radiotracers for quantifying regional cardiac sympathetic nerve density. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11:e007965. PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • Ribeiro M-J, Ricard M, Bourgeois S, Liévre M-A, Bottlaender M, Gervais P, Dollé F, Syrota A. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of [ 11 C]raclopride in healthy volunteers. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;32:952–8. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Ribeiro M-J, Ricard M, Liévre M-A, Bourgeois S, Edmond P, Gervais P, Dollé F, Syrota A. Whole-body distribution and radiation dosimetry of the dopamine transporter radioligand [ 11 C]PE2I in healthy volunteers. Nucl Med Biol. 2007;34:465–70. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Richards ML, Scott PJH. Synthesis of [ 18 F]Fluorodeoxyglucose ([ 18 F]FDG). In: Hockley BG, Scott PJH, editors. Radiochemical syntheses volume 1: radiopharmaceuticals for positron emission tomography, vol. 1. Hoboken: Wiley; 2012. p. 3–13. Google Scholar
  • Riss PJ, Ferrari V, Bielik R, Canales-Candela R, Smith R, Aigbirhio FI. Synthesis of [ 18 F]Fluoromisonidazole (1-(2-Hydroxy-3-[18F]Fluoropropyl)-2-Nitroimidazole, [ 18 F]FMISO). In: Hockley BG, Scott PJH, editors. Radiochemical syntheses volume 1: radiopharmaceuticals for positron emission tomography. Hoboken: Wiley; 2012. p. 14–49. Google Scholar
  • Rodnick ME, Brooks AF, Hockley BG, Henderson BD, Scott PJH. A fully-automated one-pot synthesis of [ 18 F]fluoromethylcholine with reduced dimethylaminoethanol contamination via [ 18 F]fluoromethyl tosylate. Appl Radiat Isot. 2013;78:26–32. CASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • Rodnick ME, Sollert C, Stark D, Clark M, Katsifis A, Hockley BG, Parr DC, Frigell J, Henderson BD, Abghari-Gerst M, Piert MR, Fulham MJ, Eberl S, Ggnon K, Scott PJH. Cyclotron-based production of 68 Ga, [ 68 Ga]GaCl₃, and [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 from a Liquid target. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem. 2020, Accepted (Preprint available here: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-38981/v1. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-38981/v1.
  • Runkle AC, Shao X, Tluczek LJ, Henderson BD, Hockley BG, Scott PJH. Automated production of [ 11 C] acetate and [ 11 C]palmitate using a modified GE Tracerlab FX_C-Pro. Appl Radiat Isot. 2011;69:691–8. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Sandgren K, Johansson L, Axelsson J, Jonsson J, Ögren M, Ögren M, Andersson M, Strandberg S, Nyholm T, Riklund K, Widmark A. Radiation dosimetry of [ 68 Ga]PSMA-11 in low-risk prostate cancer patients. EJNMMI Phys. 2019;6:2. PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • Sattler B, Kranz M, Patt M, Donat C, Deuther-Conrad W, Hoepping A, Sattler T, Steinbach J, Brust P, Sabri O. Incorporation dosimetry of F-18-Flubatine - comparison of animal model data with first-in-man results. J Nucl Med. 2012;53(suppl):1503. Google Scholar
  • Savi A, Incerti E, Fallanca F, Bettinardi V, Rosseti F, Monterisi C, Compierchio A, Negri G, Zannini P, Gianolli L, Picchio M. First evaluation of PET-based human biodistribution and dosimetry of 18 F-FAZA, a tracer for imaging tumor hypoxia. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1224–9. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Schwarz SW, Decristoforo C. US and EU radiopharmaceutical diagnostic and therapeutic nonclinical study requirements for clinical trials authorizations and marketing authorizations. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem. 2019;4:10. PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • Schwarz SW, Decristoforo C, Goodbody AE, Singhal N, Saliba S, Ruddock PS, Zukotynski K, Ross AA. Harmonization of U.S., European Union, and Canadian first-in-human regulatory requirements for radiopharmaceuticals: is this possible? J Nucl Med. 2019;60:158–66. CASGoogle Scholar
  • Schwarz SW, Dick D, VanBrocklin HF, Hoffman JM. Regulatory requirements for PET drug production. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:1132–7. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Scott DJ, Heitzeg MM, Koeppe RA, Stohler CS, Zubieta J-K. Variations in the human pain stress experience mediated by ventral and dorsal basal ganglia dopamine activity. J Neurosci. 2006;26:10789–95. CASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • Scott PJH. Synthesis of [ 13 N]Ammonia. In: Hockley BG, Scott PJH, editors. Radiochemical syntheses volume 1: radiopharmaceuticals for positron emission tomography, vol. 31. Chichester: Wiley; 2012. p. 315–20. Google Scholar
  • Segall G, Delbeke D, Stabon MG, Even-Sapir E, Fair J, Sajdak R, Smith GT. SNM practice guideline for sodium 18 F-fluoride PET/CT bone scans 1.0. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1813–20. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Seltzer MA, Jahan SA, Sparks R, Stout DB, Satyamurthy N, Dahlbom M, Phelps ME, Barrior JR. Radiation dose estimates in humans for 11 C-acetate whole-body PET. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1233–6. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Shao X, Fawaz MV, Jang K, Scott PJH. Ethanolic carbon-11 chemistry: the introduction of green radiochemistry. Appl Radiat Isot. 2014;89:125–9. CASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • Shao X, Hoareau R, Hockley BG, Tluczek LJ, Henderson BD, Padgett HC, Scott PJHSA. Highlighting the versatility of the Tracerlab synthesis modules. Part 1: fully automated production of [ 18 F]Labelled radiopharmaceuticals using a Tracerlab FX_FN. J Labelled Comp Radiopharm. 2011b;54:292–307. CASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • Shao X, Hoareau R, Runkle AC, Tluczek LJM, Hockley BG, Henderson BD, Scott PJH. Highlighting versatility of the Tracerlab synthesis modules. Part 2: fully automated production of [ 11 C]-labeled radiopharmaceuticals using a Tracerlab FX_C-Pro. J Labelled Comp Radiopharm. 2011a;54:819–38. CASGoogle Scholar
  • Shao X, Jang K, Scott PJH. Synthesis of 1-(2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-4-cyano-5-(4- [ 11 C]methoxyphenyl)-N-(piperidin-1-yl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide ([ 11 C]OMAR). In: Scott PJH, editor. Radiochemical syntheses volume 2: further radiopharmaceuticals for positron emission tomography and new strategies for their production. Hoboken: Wiley; 2015. p. 73–80. Google Scholar
  • Silveira MB, Soares MA, Valente ES, Waquil SS, Ferreira AV, dos Santost RG, da Silva JB. Synthesis, quality control and dosimetry of the radiopharmaceutical 18 F-sodium fluoride produced at the Center for Development of Nuclear Technology – CDTN. Braz J Pharm Sci. 2010;46:563–9. CASGoogle Scholar
  • Snellman A, Rokka J, López-Picón FR, Eskola O, Salmona M, Forloni G, Scheinin M, Solin O, Rinne JO, Haaparanta-Solin M. In vivo PET imaging of beta-amyloid deposition in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease with a high specific activity PET imaging agent [ 18 F]flutemetamol. EJNMMI Res. 2014;4:37. PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • Snyder SE, Gunupudi N, Sherman PS, Butch ER, Skaddan MB, Kilbourn MR, Koeppe RA, Kuhl DE. Radiolabeled cholinesterase substrates: in vitro methods for determining structure-activity relationships and identification of a positron emission tomography radiopharmaceutical for in vivo measurement of butyrylcholinesterase activity. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2001;21:132–43. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Songmen S, Nepal P, Olsavsky T, Sapire J. Axumin positron emission tomography: novel agent for prostate cancer biochemical recurrence. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2019;9:49. PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • Sörensen J, Owenius R, Lax M, Johansson S. Regional distribution and kinetics of [ 18 F]fluciclovine (anti-[ 18 F]FACBC), a tracer of amino acid transport, in subjects with primary prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:394–402. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Sowa AR, Jackson IM, Desmond TJ, Alicea J, Mufarreh AJ, Pham JM, Stauff J, Winton WP, Fawaz MV, Henderson BD, Hockley BG, Rogers VE, Koeppe RA, Scott PJH. Futureproofing [ 18 F]Fludeoxyglucose manufacture at an Academic Medical Center. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem. 2018;3:12. PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • Srinivasan S, Crandall JP, Gajwani P, Sgouros G, Mena E, Lodge MA, Wahl RL. Human radiation dosimetry for orally and intravenously administered 18 F-FDG. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:613–9. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Stabin MG, Sparks RB, Crowe E. The second-generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1023–7. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Suleiman OH, Fejka R, Houn F, Walsh M. The radioactive drug research committee: background and retrospective study ofm reported research data. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1220–6. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Tolvanen T, Yli-Kerttula T, Ujula T, Autio A, Lehikoinen P, Minn H, Roivainen A. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of [ 11 C]choline: a comparison between rat and human data. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:874–83. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • USP Positron Emission Tomography Drugs for Compounding, Investigational, and Research Uses. Radiopharmaceuticals for positron emission tomography. In: USP 43-NF 38. Rockville: The United States Pharmacopeia Convention; 2020. Google Scholar
  • VanBrocklin HF. Radiopharmaceuticals for drug development: United States regulatory perspective. Curr Radiopharm. 2008;1:2–6. CASGoogle Scholar
  • Vander Borght TM, Kilbourn MR, Koeppe RA, DaSilva JN, Carey JE, Kuhl DE, Frey KA. In vivo imaging of the brain vesicular monoamine transporter. J NucI Med. 1995;36:2252–60. CASGoogle Scholar
  • Vesselle H, Grierson J, Peterson LM, Muzi M, Mankoff DA, Krohn KA. 18 F-Fluorothymidine radiation dosimetry in human PET imaging studies. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1482–8. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Virta JR, Tolvanen T, Någren K, Brück A, Roivainen A, Rinne JO. 1- 11 C-Methyl-4-piperidinyl-N-butyrate radiation dosimetry in humans by dynamic organ-specific evaluation. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:347–53. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Wagner P. US EPA, Inert Reassessment – n-Butanol, CAS # 71–36-3 and Isobutyl Alcohol, CAS # 78–83-1. 2005, https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-04/documents/butanol.pdf. Accessed 7 Jul 2020. Google Scholar
  • Walker RC, Smith GT, Liu E, Moore B, Clanton J, Stabin M. Measured human dosimetry of 68 Ga-DOTATATE. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:855–60. CASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • Washburn LC, Sun TT, Byrd BL, Rafter JJ, Hayes RL, Frey KA, Agranoff BW. 11 C-ACHC, a potential agent for positron tomographic measurement of brain amino acid transport. In: Raynaud C, editor. Nuclear medicine and biology: proceedings of the third world congress of nuclear medicine and biology, August 29–September 2, 1982, Paris, France. Paris: Pergamon Press; 1982. p. 642–5. Google Scholar
  • Watkins GL, Jewett DM, Mulholland GK, Kilbourn MR, Toorongian SA. A captive solvent method for rapid N-[ 11 C]methylation of secondary amides: application to the benzodiazepine, 4′-Chlorodiazepam (RO5-4864). Appl Radiat Isot. 1988;39:441–4. CASGoogle Scholar
  • Wong DF, Kuwabara H, Horti AG, Raymont V, Brasic J, Guevara M, Ye W, Dannals RF, Ravert HT, Nandi A, Rahmim A, Ming JE, Grachev I, Roy C, Cascella N. Quantification of cerebral cannabinoid receptors subtype 1 (CB1) in healthy subjects and schizophrenia by the novel PET radioligand [ 11 C]OMAR. Neuroimage. 2010;52:1505–13. CASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • Wong DF, Kuwabara H, Pomper M, Holt DP, Brasic JR, George N, Frolov B, Willis W, Gao Y, Valentine H, Nandi A, Gapasin L, Dannals RF, Horti AG. Human brain imaging of α7 nAChR with [ 18 F]ASEM: a new PET radiotracer for neuropsychiatry and determination of drug occupancy. Mol Imaging Biol. 2014;16:730–8. PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • Wong KK, Piert M. Dynamic bone imaging with 99m Tc-labeled Diphosphonates and 18 F-NaF: mechanisms and applications. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:590–9. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Wrobel MC, Carey JE, Sherman PS, Kilbourn MR. Simplifying the dosimetry of carbon-11-labeled radiopharmaceuticals. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:654–60. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Yang L, Brooks AF, Makaravage KJ, Zhang H, Sanford MS, Scott PJH, Shao X. Radiosynthesis of [ 11 C]LY2795050 for preclinical and clinical PET imaging using cu(II)-mediated Cyanation. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2018;9:1274–9. CASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  • Yi C, Yu D, Shi X, He Q, Zhang X, Zhang X. Biodistribution and estimation of radiation-absorbed doses in humans for 13 N-ammonia PET. Ann Nucl Med. 2015;29:810–5. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Yoshida T, Kuwabara Y, Ichiya Y, Sasaki M, Fukumura T, Ichimiya A, Takita M, Ogomori K, Masuda K. Cerebral muscarinic acetylcholinergic receptor measurement in Alzheimer's disease patients on 11 C-N-methyl-4-piperidyl benzilate — comparison with cerebral blood flow and cerebral glucose metabolism. Ann Neurol. 1998;12:35–42. CASGoogle Scholar
  • Zubieta JK, Greenwald MK, Lombardi U, Woods JH, Kilbourn MR, Jewett DM, Koeppe RA, Schuster CR, Johanson CE. Buprenorphine-induced changes in mu-opioid receptor availability in male heroin-dependent volunteers: a preliminary study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2000;23:326–34. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Zubieta JK, Koeppe RA, Frey KA, Kilbourn MR, Mangner TJ, Foster NL, Kuhl DE. Assessment of muscarinic receptor concentrations in aging and Alzheimer disease with [ 11 C]NMPB and PET. Synapse. 2001;39:275–87. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar

  Acknowledgments

  We thank Prof. James Carey for calculating historical dosimetry data and Mr. Phillip Sherman for generating biodistribution data, as well as the many learners, staff, technologists and both basic science and clinical faculty who have contributed to the synthesis, quality control and clinical translation of PET drugs at the University of Michigan over the years. Assistance in making [ 11 C]PBR28 available for use under RDRC from Prof. Robert Innis (NIMH) is gratefully acknowledged. Lastly, we thank Prof. Nabeel Nabulsi, Prof. Richard Carson and their colleagues at the Yale PET Center for help in making [ 11 C]LY2795050 and [ 18 F]ASEM available for RDRC use at UM, and for generously allowing inclusion of their dosimetry for both radiotracers in the Supporting Information.

  Funding

  A fee waiver from EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry to make this article available Open Access is gratefully acknowledged.